To Laugh or Not to Laugh: How Comedy News Versus Hard News Interacts with Individuals’ Levels of Political Cynicism and Political Efficacy to Impact the Agenda-Setting Effects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58997/smc.v28i2.57Abstract
This experiment investigated how the same information presented as either hard news or comedy news interacted with individuals’ levels of cynicism and levels of efficacy to impact the agendasetting effects. The results indicated individuals who received the comedy news story and had increased levels of cynicism accepted the media’s agenda more than those who received the same information presented as hard news. However, individuals who received the hard news story and had increased levels of efficacy were more likely to cite the issue they received as compared to those who received the same information presented as comedy news.References
Anderson, N., Danis, M., & Stohl, M. (2009). Onscreen Muslims: Media, Identity, Terrorism, and Public Policy. Presented at the International Communication Association 2009 annual meeting.
Baum. M.A. (2003). Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Baumgartner, J.C. & Morris, J.S. (2006). The Daily Show Effect: Candidate Evaluations, Efficacy, and American Youth. American Politics Research, 34(3), 341-367.
Baumgartner, J. & Morris, J. (2008). One “Nation” Under Stephen? The Effects of The Colbert Report on American Youth. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 622643.
Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dearing J. W. & Rogers E. M. (1996). Agenda Setting. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.
De Vreese, C. (2003). Strategic news and political knowledge: a cocktail for political cynicism? International Communication Association Annual Conference, 1-43.
De Vreese, C. (2005). The Spiral of Cynicism Reconsidered. European Journal of Communication, 20(3), 283-301.
De Vreese, C. (2004). The Effects of Strategic News on Political Cynicism, Issue Evaluation, and Policy Support: A Two-Wave Experiment. Mass Communication & Society, 7(2), 191-214.
De Vreese, C., Semetko, H. A. (December 2002). Cynical and Engaged: Strategic Campaign Coverage, Public Opinion, and Mobilization in a Referendum. Communication Research, 29(6), 615-641.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-59.
Entman, R. M., & Rojecki, A. (1993). Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti-nuclear movement. Political Communication, 10(2), 155-173. To Laugh or Not to Laugh 24
Fox, J.R., Koloen, G. & Sahin, V. (2007). No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Broadcast Television Coverage of the 2004 Presidential Election Campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(2), 213-227.
Fu, H., Mou, Y., Miller, M., & Jalette, G. (2011). Reconsidering Political Cynicism and Political Involvement: A Test of Antecedents. American Communication Journal, 13(2), 44-61.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1986). More than meets the eye: TV news, priming, and public evaluations of the president. In G. Comstock (Ed.) Public Communication and Behavior, Volume 1 (pp. 135-163). Syracuse, New York: Academic Press, Inc.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kowalewski, J. (2011). “Does Humor Matter? An Analysis of How Hard News versus Entertainment News Style Influence Agenda-Setting Effects.” Presented at the International Communication Association national conference.
Lyttle, J. (2001). The effectiveness of comedy in persuasion: The case of business ethics training. Journal of General Psychology, 128, 206-216.
McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
Miller, J. M. (2007). Examining the mediators of agenda setting: A new experimental paradigm reveals the role of emotions. Political Psychology, 28(6), 689-717.
Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science 44(2), 301-315.
Miller, R. E. & Wanta, W. (Winter 1996). Race as a variable in agenda setting, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 913-925.
Nabi, R.L., Moyer-Gusé, E., & Byrne, S. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 29-54.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Pinkleton, B. & Austin, E. (1998). Media and Participation: Breaking the Spiral of Disaffection, in T. Johnson, C. Hays, & S. Hays (eds), Engaging the Public: How Government and the Media Can Reinvigorate American Democracy, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 75-86.
Pinkleton, B., Austin, E., Zhou, Y., Willoughby, J., & Reiser, M. (2012). Perceptions of News Media, External Efficacy, and Public Affairs Apathy in Political Decision Making and Disaffection. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(1), 23-39.
Rowley, J. (2012). U.S. Congress Returns to Washington Amid Historically Low Approval Ratings. Bloomberg.com, Jan. 17, 2012. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0117/congress-returns-amid-historically-low-approval-ratings-in-polls.html
Saad, L. (2011). Americans Express Historic Negativity Toward U.S. Government. Gallup Politics, Sept. 26, 2011. http://www.gallup.com/poll/149678/americans-express-historicnegativity-toward-government.aspx
Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society 3(2&3), 297-316.
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication 57, 9-20.
Wagg, S. (2002). Comedy, politics and permissiveness: the “satire boom” and its inheritance. Contemporary Politics, 8(1), 319-334.
Weaver, D. (July 1980). Audience need for orientation and media effects. Communication Research, 7(3), 361-377.
Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication 57, 142-147.
Weaver, D. H., Zhu, J., & Willnat, L. (Winter 1992). The bridging function of interpersonal communication in agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 856-867.
Yagade, A., & Dozier, D. M. (1990). The media agenda-setting effect of concrete versus abstract issues. Journalism Quarterly, 67(1), 3-10.
Young, D. & Tisinger, R. (2006). Dispelling Late-Night Myths: News Consumption Among Late-Night Comedy Viewers and the Predictors of Exposure to Various Late-Night Shows. Press/Politics, 11(3), 113-134.
