Would You Say The Process Was Contentious or Smooth Sailing? Administrators’ Views On Revising The Mass Communication Curriculum

Authors

  • Jim Senroe Midwestern State University
  • Mitzi Lewis Midwestern State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58997/smc.v29i2.75

Abstract

This study seeks to build upon our earlier investigation of how mass communication programs across the country are altering their curricula in order to accommodate the major changes in our field brought on by the Internet. While our earlier study looked at how degree plans are changing and what educators in the field think is important, this study again examines the how and the what, but expands to include: What has been your biggest challenge regarding your program’s curriculum? How have you deal with that challenge? Why did you make the changes you made? Beyond that, what philosophical beliefs underlie the changes? We also look at how the process played out: smooth sailing, a few minor skirmishes or downright contentious.

References

Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (2012). Journalism & Mass Communication Directory 2011-­‐‑2012. Columbia, SC.

Blom, R., & Davenport, L. (2010, August). Searching for the core of journalism education: Program directors widely disagree on curriculum priorities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-­‐‑101.

Cassidy, B. (2010, July). Curriculum fatigue. AEJMC News, 16.

Frangoulis, G. J. (1993, August). How we teach magazine journalism: An analysis of today’s magazine curricula. A contemporary study of magazine journalism education in U.S. colleges and universities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Kansas City.

Friedman, S. M. (1994, August). Environmental journalism education: A growing enterprise. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Atlanta.

Huang, E., Davison, K., Shreve, S., Davis, T., Bettendorf, E., & Nair, A. (2006). Bridging newsrooms and classrooms: Preparing the next generation of journalists for converged media. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 8, 221-­‐‑262.

Kock, E., Kang, J. G, & Allen, D. S. (1999). Broadcast education curricula in 2-­‐‑year and 4-­‐year colleges. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 54, 4-­‐‑15.

Kraeplin, C., & Criado, C. A. (2005). Building a case for convergence journalism curriculum. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 60, 47-­‐‑56.

Lepre, C., & Bleske, G. L. (2005). Little common ground for magazine editors and professors surveyed on journalism curriculum. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 60, 190-­‐‑200.

Sudhoff, D., & Donnelly, J. (2003). Upgrading course offerings. Quill, 91(5), 62-­‐‑63.

Ryan, M., & Switzer, L. (2001). Balancing arts and sciences, skills, and conceptual content. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 56, 55-­‐‑68.

Tanner, A. H., & Duhé, S. F. (2005). Trends in mass media education in the age of media convergence: Preparing students for careers in a converging news environment. Simile, 5(3). Retrieved from EBSCOHost on Feb. 7, 2011.

Todd, V. (2009). PRSSA faculty and professional advisors’ perceptions of public relations curriculum, assessment of students’ learning, and faculty performance. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 64, 71-­‐‑90.

Vlad, T., Becker, L. B., Simpson, H., & Kalpen, K. (2013). 2012 annual survey of journalism & mass communication enrollments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, D.C.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-20

Issue

Section

Articles