Girls of the Gunosphere

Authors

  • Dawn R. Gilpin Arizona State University
  • Leslie-Jean Thornton Arizona State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58997/smc.v33i2.35

Abstract

We selected five representative images of young (infant to pre-teen) girls from a corpus of over 20,000 images posted to Instagram with hashtags related to guns and gun culture. These images served as a springboard for in-depth visual and vernacular analysis, to explore manifestations of girlhood in online gun culture. By combining images, text, technical affordances such as up to 30 hashtags per post with no character limit, and social networking and community building, Instagram offers a rich and as yet understudied platform for cultural analysis. Our analyses permitted an original exploration of notions of empowerment and agency as conceived at the intersection of a distinct subculture and the constraints of social media. Girls—or, more commonly, their parents—in the online “gunosphere” explore their identities within a contested space characterized by themes of traditional femininity, family values, safe environments, education and socialization, and commodification. These findings point to larger themes within US gun culture, which inhabits a unique intersection between consumer culture/marketing logics, affective historic/patriotic themes, political lobby and social movement, strongly characterized by masculinist notions of power that square uneasily with nuanced approaches to gender.

References

-- (n.d.). Nine Line Apparel: About Us. Retrieved from https://www.ninelineapparel.com/aboutus/.

Browder, L. (2006). Her best shot: Women and guns in America. Chapel Hill: UNC Press.

Bucholtz, M. (2003). Theories of discourse as theories of gender: Discourse analysis in language and gender studies. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender (pp. 43-68). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Burbick, J. (2006). Gun show nation: Gun culture and American democracy. New York: New Press.

Carr, E. S. (2003). Rethinking empowerment theory using a feminist lens: The importance of process. Affilia, 18(1), 8-20. doi:10.1177/0886109902239092.

Coffey, J., & Farrugia, D. (2014). Unpacking the black box: The problem of agency in the sociology of youth. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(4), 461-474. doi:10.1080/13676261.2013.830707.

Fudge, R. (1999, June 1). The Buffy effect: A tale of cleavage and marketing. Bitch Media. Retrieved from https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/buffy-effect.

Godfrey, S., & Hamad, H. (2012). Save the cheerleader, save the males: Resurgent protective paternalism in popular film and television after 9/11. In K. Ross (Ed.), The handbook of gender, sex, and media (pp. 157-173). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Gonick, M., Renold, E., Ringrose, J., & Weems, L. (2009). Rethinking agency and resistance: What comes after girl power? Girlhood Studies, 2(3), 1-9. doi:10.3167/ghs.2009.020202.

Homsher, D. (2001). Women & guns: Politics and the culture of firearms in America. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Kieffer, C. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective. In J. Rappaport, C. Swift, & R. Hess (Eds.), Studies in Empowerment: Steps toward understanding and action (pp. 9-36). New York: Hayworth Press.

Lester, P. M. (2017). Visual communication: Images with messages (7 th ed.). Dallas, TX: WritingForTextbooks.

McRobbie, A. (2008). Young women and consumer culture. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 531-550. doi:10.1080/09502380802245803

Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stange, M. Z. (1997). Woman the Hunter. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Twine, F. W. (2013). Girls with guns: Firearms, feminism, and militarism. New York: Routledge.

Zaslow, E., & Schoenberg, J. (2012). Stumping to girls through pop culture: Feminist interventions to shape future political leaders. Women & Language, 35(1), 97-116.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-04

Issue

Section

Articles